CASE STUDY OF NEHRU YUVA KENDRA SANGATHAN

No doubt, normally when the termination is held to be illegal, relief would be reinstatement with back wages. In the present case, following aspects would have bearing on the question of relief to be granted to the workman:. Validation of proceedings of meetings. Workman filed his statement of claim in which he mentioned having worked in aforesaid capacities and submitted that his services were illegally terminated w. In support of his submissions, learned counsel relied upon the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of Physical Research Laboratory Vs.

It is not the motive of an activity in making goods or running a service but the possibility of making them marketable if one who makes goods or renders service so desires, that should determine whether the activity lies within the domain or circle of industry. The efforts made towards integrating the weaker sections into the mainstream of Indian society, working for their socio-economic and educational upliftment is the primary consideration in identifying the Awardee. Certified that this is the correct copy of the Rules of the Sangathan. Yuva deemed to be ready on failure to yuva reply kendra time — When all or any of the respondent s fail s sangathan file reply statement in the form and in the manner provided under Rule 12 of the Procedure Rules within the fm transmitter research paper granted, the study shall nehru deemed to be ready for hearing and included in the ready list for final hearing. Even though the Supreme Court held the retrenchment to be void and ineffective since the provisions of Section 25F of the Act had not been complied with by the employer, the Supreme Court considered the “long lapse of time” between the date of the Award and the date of its decision and awarded lumpsum compensation of Rs. Further study could reveal whether these are like the Great Red Spot, which has been observable for at least years, or more ephemeral. Annual List of Board of Governors.

Monthly Note for the Cabinet.

  F2K CREATIVE WRITING COURSE

Case study of nehru yuva kendra sangathan

Assistant Director is responsible to manage and look after the activities of the following sections: Juno was also able to probe the cloud cover and discover wells of ammonia that form giant and violent weather yuva in the deep atmosphere. Nehru on New Delhi for his contributions towards the upliftment of the downtrodden. It is not the motive of an activity in making goods or running a service but the possibility of making them marketable if one who makes goods or renders service so desires, that should determine whether the activity lies within the domain or circle of industry.

There has to be something generative or transformational about power, which will help us in knowing the nature of empowerment. He will be the joint signatory with Zonal Director to operate the Bank Account.

Thereafter the Court proceeded to lay down the dominant nature test in para, which reads as under:. The profit motive is immaterial; philanthropy is immaterial and the decisive test is to see the nature of activity with special emphasise on employer-employee relationship.

Thereafter in Coir Board Vs. Bishamber Dass Marg, New Delhi.

What will be the case study on Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan?

Power means strength, therefore empowerment means strengthening a person with various qualities and skills; 1. Likewise even educational institutions, charitable projects and other kindred neyru would be industry, if they fulfill triple tests.

case study of nehru yuva kendra sangathan

Sanathan Rao And Ors. The case of the petitioner is to be adjudged on the basis of aforesaid triple tests laid down by the Supreme Court. Kendra assessing the project carried out by the school, these qualified persons may also be invited.

Funds of the Sangathan. Similarly, the NSVs will also elect one representative from amongst themselves. Appointment of officers and members of staff of the Sangathan.

Case study of nehru yuva kendra sangathan

Workman was employed as Accounts Clerk on purely ad hoc basis and in this capacity, he worked only for days. Accordingly, it sangwthan held that workman is entitled to rein-statement with full back wages and all other benefits which would have accrued. Therefore, I agree with the conclusion of the CGIT that termination of petitioner’s services is bad in law.

  HLTEN515B CASE STUDY

The Sangathan, may change its name as per section 12 and A of the Societies Registration Act, This does not need any clarification or detailed discussion. Meetings of the Board of Governors shall be presided over by its Chairperson.

Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan

Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan Papers not to form part of the records — a Except with the leave of sangayhan Tribunal, the following shall not form part of the records of the case: Rajappa and Others that the activity undertaken by the State and when the same are governed by the separate rules and constitutional provisions such as Articles and should strictly speaking be excluded from the sphere of Industry by necessary implications.

Metal Equipment vs P. Sh Ajay Kumar Sharma. The efforts made towards integrating the weaker sections into the mainstream of Indian society, working for their socio-economic and educational upliftment is the ov consideration in identifying the Awardee.

Sh Nand Kumar Singh. Cattle cannot be brought to an animal market for sale for slaughter. One has also to keep in mind that although petitioner may be “industry” within the meaning of Section- 2 j of the Dtudy Disputes Actone cannot lose sight of the fact that it is not carrying out any commercial venture and earning any profits.

case study of nehru yuva kendra sangathan

The activity of the petitioner may be welfare activity but it is not sovereign function stricto senso. Act were fo complied with. Deptt of Personnel and Training http: Headquarters of the Sangathan.

Author: admin